Teals’ Silence Code
Where is Teal’s Congaline separating itself from the Bradfield candidate? Nicolette Bereafter she made an inappropriate sexual gag with a teenage hairdresser?
She apologised in that standard non-approval way, but I’m even more concerned about her virtue and why her colleagues aren’t saying they should reject herself from the election race.
Imagine how they reacted if a liberal lawmaker did what Bele did. Imagine that for a while Paul Fletcherthe first liberal lawmaker in Bradfield since 2009. Their collective mouth foaming would have been a spectacular sight! The demand for that lawmaker to resign would have been limitless. The media’s appeal to the story would have been a continuous distraction.
But the female Teal does it, and it’s the silence of the cockpit from the Teal MP Collective. One of them doesn’t criticize what Boele did. It’s not just one. That’s despite their maiden speeches praise the importance of good behavior and integrity in politics.
Did you know that Bole has what he calls “Shadow Election Job,” which was established in Bradfield for the past three years during this parliamentary term?
Imagine that – call yourself a “member of the Shadows of Bloodfield”!
And it’s not even a secret. Crikey and her Slobbering Media cheerleader in Saturday’s paper trumpeted the moniker like the great Zinger previously.
Pollies and Journos are laughing out loud this week with Teal candidate Nicolette Boele. Nicolet Boe once owned “Shadow Member for Bradfield” until a humble incident at a local salon.
A staff member at Gordon’s AV Room Salon (pictured) said Bole was banned “indefinitely” after making inappropriate sexual gags with a teenage hairdresser.
The silence from Teal over Boele’s inappropriate sexual gags is frankly deafening. Imagine how they reacted if the liberals did what Bele did. For a while, if it were Paul Fletcher (pictured), then Bradfield’s MP since 2009.
Of course, after the Salon Incident, it became a joke between Pollies and political journalists. How embarrassing.
Knowing the whole “shadow member” makes it easier to understand the arrogance that somehow made her think about it. Suitable for making sexually covered jokes she did.
You need a certain type of person to think that either of them is normal.
But her fellow Teal, regardless of doing so, has completely removed their self-righteousness as a result.
As far as I have been a natural ally of blue-green, I have created myself as an alternative to the moderate center that the liberals have long been neglecting women. These are topics I’ve written for years.
But there is little worse than hypocrites, and hypocrisy lies around the blue-green green when it comes to practicing preaching.
Nothing is more clear than their (non)reaction to what Boele did.
The Age of Truth in Arbo
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s strange denial that he fell off the stage at Thursday’s union event highlights a rather tense relationship with the Labour leader’s truth
“I didn’t fall off the stage.”
That was Anthony AlbaneseGod’s honest answer when asked how he felt after falling off stage at a Union event where he attended the election trajectory.
As Tony Abbott I once said, “*** will happen.” People always fall. That in itself is not a big deal. Politicians dropped out of the stage before – take John Howard For example, during the 1996 election campaign. For his biography, he said he twisted his ankle so badly, but wrapped it down and quietly held back from the pain of the rest of the campaign.
But for the most strange reason, the current Prime Minister decided to shaking and denying that he had fallen, claiming that one leg had not fallen from the stage rather than two. Strange.
With the tip of his shoes still touching the side of the stage, and unless his second leg was distorted at a right angle, he clearly fell with both legs closed.
But no, he quipped about it. Incidentally, the natural response to denial of undeniable people caught on camera says a lot about Albo’s career politicians.
Simply put, he is loose in truth. The exact same criticism he leveled regularly Scott Morrison. Incidentally, perfectly correct – Morrison was true and loose.
Arbo’s ability to call “night”, black “white”, and “below” is easier to grasp when he hears him denial that he will fall from that stage.
The politician resigned in stages – for example (photo) taking John Howard with him in the 1996 election campaign. That in itself is not a big deal. As Tony Abbott once said, “s*** happens.”
Certainly, his denial may have been a knee-jerk response to embarrassment. But a mess of his track record shows that it is not an isolated incident.
He is pleased to break his promises about superannuation and tax cuts for the three stagers, and continues to deny his promise to cut his electricity bills.
These negations are more calculated as accepting each is politically harmful, but what excuses are they to denial of falling from that stage?
The only thing I can think of is that the lies have become a second nature for him. If true, it’s a very sad situation.
Dutton’s strategy is still a mystery
With the first week of the campaign completed and dusting, there is no doubt that labour thrusts his nose in front.
As readers of this column know, I have long said that despite being a minority government, I am hoping that Labour will win this election.
The polls I had Peter Dutton And in the months before the budget, the previous coalition was nothing more than the outcome of a protest.
When elections are called and budgets are provided, it is constantly adjusted. This happened when the first round of published votes was announced earlier last week.
Still, whose game is it? Especially since the public hasn’t been turned on properly yet.
Peter Dutton’s (center) victory is the slow realization by voters that the last thing they want is three years of labor running the joint in a partnership with the Greens
In four more weeks, why are they? Before we reach Election Day, school holidays, Easter head weekends, and Anzac long weekends are still here.
By then, there are only four days left of the campaign before the big day. This is probably in favour of labor.
Distracted electors are unlikely to change in favor of government, and certainly not after a term of office, not in a particularly uncertain time. Thank you for Donald TrumpThe customs announcement of the time we live is uncertain.
Dutton’s only real hope is the slow realization by voters that the last thing they want is that three more years of labor will run the joint. Certainly it doesn’t match the green. This is the only way workers can win this election.
As for what the Union campaign looks like, we can’t see yet, but if it increases, it will focus on the decline in livelihoods and argue that another three years of work will only make the situation worse.
On Tuesday evening, leaders are head-on in the discussion of the first election. That should show us early on how the coalition hopes to fight back on polls.
It also better understands whether voters view themselves as viable alternative PMs rather than merely belligerent opposition leaders.
Forgiveness of debt is a farce
The final thoughts on one of the workers’ election promises – if re-elected, it reduces everyone’s HECS debt by 20%.
I’ve always covered federal politics, and I honestly say this is the worst election bribery I’ve ever seen.
Albo could have included a promise in this year’s budget, but perhaps not because his priorities were to use it as a voting purchase tool.
This policy literally wipes out a fifth of all HECS obligations. If you’ve already paid back yours, it’s too bad! If you’re a new student who hasn’t yet accumulated HECS debt, it’s too bad! Nothing will change for you.
If workers’ election promises are re-elected, reducing everyone’s HECS debt by 20% is honestly the most serious electoral bribery be I’ve ever seen as a political journalist.
And the entire campaign to buy and sell votes will not show up as more debt on budget documents – remember that this policy is expected to cost $16 billion. That’s because HECS is considered federal investment and is “out of budget.”
The government does not need to own a bribe to contribute to the deficit, but if it allows HECS debt worth $16 billion, the costs will be transferred to citizen debt immediately.
The dishonor of this policy approach is clear even if we think reforms in the field of higher education are necessary.
What will stop Peter Dutton and the Coalition from matching their vote-buying commitments or double it to double it to Arbo? There’s really nothing other than acting semi-responsively.
